Our client, an Employment Law Firm in New York, hired 3 Remote Attorneys to handle an uptick in caseload. Legal Soft's pre-vetted remote attorneys with U.S. law experience were able to draft pleadings, agreements, and motions as well as prepare court documents and filings for on-staff attorneys. The client was also keen on their ability to draft contracts, advise on compliance issues, and directly communicate with their clients when the need arose. Ultimately, our client was able to increase revenue by maximizing their billable hours per client.
Goals & Objectives
Our case study determined the increased revenue, cost savings and efficiency improvements associated with hiring a remote attorney for U.S. Law Firms. The firm compared the financial impact of employing a remote attorney versus a full-time, in-house attorney.
Cost Savings Breakdown
Remote
vs. In-House
Remote
vs. In-House
Remote
vs. In-House
Remote
vs. In-House
Remote
vs. In-House
Summary Savings
Our client benefited from a streamlined support system, which led to an annual savings of more than $583K per year. By adding 3 remote attorneys, they were able to handle 200 more cases than usual. All told, our client generated over 1.25M in additional revenue with the help of Legal Soft’s remote attorneys.
Our trained and qualified talent pool of legal professionals helped our client reduce the amount of time needed to scale their case managers to full capacity by 80%.
As a result of their ongoing success in augmenting their in-house staff with virtual staff, our client explored adding additional roles, such as case managers and demand writers, to handle their growing caseload.
Join our newsletter today Get instant updates
