A mid-sized law firm was able to make the leap from a solo practice to operating at scale by hiring virtual staff. Over the course of 3 months, they hired over 10 virtual staff members to help establish a foundation to ramp up their caseload. The key challenge was balancing their need for core support and specialized roles throughout their organization. Legal Soft successfully navigated these challenges, assisting the client in scaling up resources as needed over time.
By choosing to staff up with Legal Soft's premier pool of U.S.-experienced legal professionals, our client was able to improve the quality of their work, control hiring costs, and ensure client satisfaction.
Goals & Objectives
Our case study determined the increased revenue, cost savings, and efficiency improvements associated with hiring remote staff for U.S. Law Firms. The firm compared the financial impact of employing remote staff versus full-time, in-house staff.
Cost Savings Breakdown
Remote
Attorney
vs. In-House
Attorney
Remote
Case Manager
vs. In-House
Case Manager
Remote
Paralegal
vs. In-House
Paralegal
Remote
Attorney
vs. In-House
Attorney
Remote
Attorney
vs. In-House
Attorney
Summary Savings

